I feel the need to write about something I am all worked about about.
This morning, one of my Facebook friends posted a link to an article by Chuck Norris about something in Obama's healthcare plan. It was about parenting programs that the government wants to provide in low-income areas. The "well-trained and competent staff," would "provide parents with knowledge of age-appropriate child development in cognitive, language, social, emotional, and motor domains ... modeling, consulting, and coaching on parenting practices," and "skills to interact with their child to enhance age-appropriate development."(The quotes are taken directly from the original document; they're not Chuck Norris's words.) The girl who posted it agreed with Chuck Norris.
I made the mistake of politely disagreeing and saying that I thought something like this would be great. It prompted reactions from a bunch of other people I went to college with, talking about how awful this was, and who is the government to tell us how to parent, and soon they'll be trying to make home-schooling illegal, and it's a slippery slope. (By the way, I really hate the phrase "slippery slope.")
I strongly disagree, but I don't want to continue to argue, because clearly I am the minority, and I seriously doubt anything I say would change their minds. But I have some comments I need to make.
Do they have any idea how bad things really are in some places? This program is clearly not designed for parents like them, who are educated and make their children a priority. They may think it's classist to say that low-income people don't know how to parent, but let's face it- in many cases, it's true. I'm tired of kids subsisting on diets of Flamin' Hots. Wouldn't it be great if parents could be educated about proper nutrition? Our PE teacher was shocked to discover last year that her younger students didn't know how to do somersaults. Wouldn't it be nice if parents were taught how to play with their kids? (Which, by the way, I have an amazing cousin out in CA who runs a program that does just that.) My friend once ran into one of her former students at a laundromat. This girl was in 8th grade and had just had a baby. My friend said that the poor baby's head was wobbling all over the place, and she had to show the girl how to support his head and explain the importance of that. Wouldn't it be helpful for young parents to be taught about child development?
I really don't think the goal of this program is to invade people's homes and make them parent according to someone else's values. People need to be educated, and this is a good start.
P.S. I'm not trying to argue about healthcare reform, because honestly, I don't know enough about it to say much. I'm specifically talking about this parenting program that Chuck Norris refers to as "Dirty Secret #1 in Obamacare."
2 comments:
I have to agree with you. While there are many things I disagree with in Obama's healthcare plan, I think that having programs that would allow people to educate themselves would be wonderful. I mean, not everyone has supportive parents or friends that can help them. Not everyone can knows the basics such as supporting a baby's head. (Scary but true). I think it would be great to have free programs like this to help those in need. And like you said, not everyone falls into the category to need this kind of help, and they shouldn't have to get the help. However, I think that making it available to everyone helps so much!
So I'm wondering why Chuck Norris has credibility on this? I don't get it. Anyway, I'll address the issue. :)
I agree with you, and it seems like we should be able to get behind educational programs that are aimed at giving people info they need to break out of a bad cycle (in addition to parenting, I think personal finance and sex ed would be really useful, and not only for the poor).
I think that there is a group of people in the US who are afraid that government interventions of any kind are restrictions on their own freedoms. This is one that seems pretty clearly to give freedoms, not take them away, though. You could even make the argument that by denying people this kind of basic information, we would collectively be putting the health of them and their family at risk (not to mention driving up the shared cost via taxes of paying for their treatment when they get sick as a result of malnutrition).
Post a Comment